After the second beginner’s course

Yesterday we finished the second of our Bolognese swordsmanship beginner’s courses. We have traditionally been open to newcomers around the year (and still are), but we are aiming to shift to a model where beginner’s are introduced to the style and safe training through a course designed for this purpose. This will benefit not only the beginners, who will get a consistent introduction to the art where the next lesson is always built upon the previous, but also the other students as the regular classes can better focus on the needs of the more experienced people.

This second course was different from the first one. In designing the class plan for it I wanted to correct the problems of the previous one and try out a few new ideas. MAinly, I wanted there to be less material, more repetition and more of a feeling of accomplishment to the students. Previously the choreographies were longer, there were more cutting exercises, more unnecessary detail in the drills and so on. This time we focused a lot on free-form footwork, building a good base, general cutting practice basically only through the Meyer square which I borrowed from our longsword classes and then focusing on the variations of the simple combination of mandritto feint and a cut around.

I am still not entirely satisfied with how the material worked, but one thing is clear: this time we had much less “trouble” learning all round, and basically the only hindrance in learning the students had was the lack of masks which called for a very careful training and some adjustments in a few drills to facilitate better safety. Learning control is a good thing, of course, but basically I would rather have students learn controlled practice against a mask from the beginning than completely pulling their blows. I see training without masks a more advanced skill in a way.

Learning to throw long, beautiful and effective mandritti and roversi, with good stepping and posture – keeping the left hand at the hip, extending with the steps whether it be a half or a full pass and recovering safely (usually with the said roverso) is an excellent beginning spot for training. This combination will teach not only attacking, but also defense and beating the opponent’s sword in order to attack. For there is no much difference between these mechanically. It will teach the mezza volta di mano, half-turn of the hand, which is the change from coda longa to porta di ferro or vice versa. When applied to a pair exercise it will teach some of the provocations beyond mere attack and defense. Namely the feint-strike combination as well as the ribattere, or beating the opponent’s blade.

I begin all the attacking and defending, feinting and provoking with a mandritto, and if time permits, all of these can be applied on the other side as well. But before that I introduce attacking or provoking with a thrust instead. This stoccata thrust will be transformed into a cut, familiar from the previous drill. Lastly, the cut following the feint can be thrown to the leg instead, teaching the students to go low with their actions if necessary.

The things I’m not entirely satisfied with is how to most efficiently teach the way in which the mandritto is turned into a roverso after the feint since there are essentially two ways to do this, and showing the difference is not always straight forward. Likewise, I am not yet happy with the way I do the beat and attack. The distance, timing and the following attack, as well as the angle of the beating cut itself still need refining. Finally, I am not sure whether I want to keep the Meyer square in my Bolognese training, especially at basic level. As much as I love the drill, it is more Meyer and I do not wish to proceed with the combination of mandritto sgualembrato and roverso ridoppio in pair exercises with the beginners. I prefer learning the combination of two sgualembrati first.

But these are minor points. I am happy about the progress and the results I saw in the ten or so students who took the course. I wish they will stay for further training, as the Beginner’s course is, as name implies, only the beginning. In eight classes it is not even possible to properly cover the so-called alphabet of Bolognese fencing, much less all the tactical, technical and mechanical beauty found withing this art.

Now, off to Dijon!

Marozzo’s images

The greatest challenge in working with Bolognese sources may well be the vast amount of text that they consist of. It is good to have a lot of material to work with, but it makes it harder to get started.

The most famous and the most multifaceted of the Bolognese texts, the Opera Nova of Achille Marozzo has a surprising amount of illustrations printed in it. Still today these might not be familiar to everyone, and in any case below is a widget providing easy and quick way to browse them.

Website news

Marozzo.com will go through some major updates during the following weeks.

The blog will remain online (this time the old posts will be accessible after the update) and be a key part of the website, but beyond this I want the website to give a better idea of what I have made of the Bolognese style of swordplay and what I want to see it become in the future.

This content is more oriented towards new visitors and will be more static, but new updates will be introduced in the for of articles and video essays (in the future).

Besides just talking about Bolognese swordsmanship the website will give info on workshops and events I’ll be running or demonstrating in, so that you can more easily learn of the style in a practical way.

There will be more content on general training and exercise as well.

I hope these changes will help grow the reader base of this website and increase the popularity of the Bolognese tradition — since that is my goal in the HEMA community at the moment.

Stay tuned for more updates!

Research work

In the early spring we started a weekly class on Bolognese sword and buckler. While I really like working with the buckler it is obvious from my perspective that the time is not yet right for me to truly focus on the sidearms. For this reason I have let the sword and buckler classes shift in focus towards more advanced classes, sort of “fighting classes”, where participants are free to use bucklers if they choose to, but they can also work with the sword alone.

I have previously attempted to focus on buckler by working through the assalti, but there have been too many inconveniences preventing me from their practice. I will pick them up at some point however, as it is my goal to work through all of them (which are, if memory serves me right, three for sword alone, two for sword and dagger, five for sword and buckler, two for sword and rotella, two for the spadone and few more for polearms). Between work, fitness training, four or five weekly sword classes and other things in life there just hasn’t been enough time for assalto-practice, which requires a large space with distractions and privacy.

I can deliver so much better classes to my students without the buckler that I can’t fully justify running buckler classes at this time, especially because planning and executing the beginner’s course during same day (right after the buckler class) is mentally rather taxing. The sidearms will be revisited in the future however, and using them in free-fencing is something I’m planning on always allowing unless the exercise requires specifically focusing on a specific weapon or weapon combination.

On another front, I have begun translating Bolognese material into Finnish language. While English is way more important on a global scale, I believe a local translation would be extremely helpful and easier to understand for my Finnish students. And the good thing is that a lot of the material has already been translated into English, and in the case of the Anonimo, I am working together with Francesco Lanza, who is producing an English translation of the material which helps me with the Finnish translation.

The English translation will probably be published in some form as well, when it is ready, but no decisions have yet been made one way or another.

Before getting too excited I have to note that whether or not the whole of something is enormous as the Anonimo will be published will remain to be seen; to start with we are translating to both languages the introductory part of the text. On its own, this already will help undersatnd the Bolognese tradition and the context in which it was born and exercised.

My aim is to create a Finnish primer to Bolognese tradition, that would consist of a translation fo the introductions of Manciolino, Anonimo and dall’Agochhie and then a glossary and a basic interpretation of the style – a presentation of how I personally use the style and teach it. Marozzo follows a different structure in his work and doesn’t provide a similar introduction, hence his work would only be quoted and referenced where necessary but there wouldn’t be a translation of any part of his work.

There is a possibility I will simultaneously produce this work in English as well.